Historia strony
10 maj 2006
21 kwi 2006
Adding 'noinclude' tags since some pages are actually transcluding this one.
+23
Adding protection template. See Talk page.
+14
Protected Template:Infobox: Contents of page still disputed. Restoring protection and instituting straw poll. [edit=sysop:move=sysop]
mrmv conditionals. this is a _basic_ template for new template editors. Conditionals are not _basic_ tools.
-419
Restored Usage instructions (none available on the talk page)
+610
19 kwi 2006
attempt number 2...
m-27
Replace data5 "hack" with something clearer that *appears* to work in the same way.
-10
brak opisu edycji
brak opisu edycji
-27
brak opisu edycji
+81
cleanup, convert qif to #if:
-662
Removed protection - assume #if: has resolved the dispute
-36
18 kwi 2006
19 lut 2006
protected
+36
rvt - part of that compromise was placing a link to it from here, which you and Trodel rejected
+487
rvt per compromise, which create Template:Infobox Conditionals
-487
rvt - it's only complicated until editors see it in action and get a chance to learn it, via this sample infobox
+487
rvt to less complex code
-487
16 lut 2006
rvt - compromise was dismissed by Trodel and Netoholic, reverting to original
m+487
removing complex code, per agreement on talk by several contributors
-487
14 lut 2006
13 lut 2006
rvt - then it appears we don't have a compromise anymore; I'll be reverting this at will since you seem unwilling to compromise
+487
The compromise is linked to on the talk page - wikipedians who can't find it on the talk page should not be using an advance technique like that
-487
12 lut 2006
rvt - the compromise included linking to the advanced template from this template, but that was rejected
+487
we had a compromise (create alternate advanced template), see talk
-487
11 lut 2006
rvt - I looked at the talk page, I see nothing new; the only compromise there that was supported has been reverted by you and Trodel
m+487
we had a compromise, see talk
-234
we had a compromise, see talk
-253
rvt - yes, it is very confusing WP:OWN
m+253
10 lut 2006
6 lut 2006
rvt - have it your way, I'm not compromising anymore
m+487
Category is good enough. put "see also" on talk, if needed
-134
rvt - sigh
+97
including a link here is no better than explaining it here - it still encourages new users to use conditionals - when they should be discouraged from using them
-97
5 lut 2006
4 lut 2006
rv - and still no consensus to do it
-450
Revert - see Template talk:Infobox for a lengthy justification.
+450
rv
m-450
um... what guidelines for meta-template usage? WP:AUM is simply an essay at this point. And for hiding empty rows, {{qif}} is the best we currently have.
+450
3 lut 2006
rv - this revision fails all guidelines for meta-template usage
m-450
Reversion to revision 37961367 using popups
+450
rvt, this is Infobox 101
-450
rvt again, per talk; please pretend you two respect consensus
m+450
using conditionals should not be taught to new users
-450
rvt per talk
m+450
using conditionals sets a bad example for new template creators
-450
rvt as per talk
m+450
remove conditional instructions
-450